Legal Opinion

Topaz Beryllium Co. v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided May 21, 1981No. 79-2255PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McKAY, Circuit Judge.

Appellants seek a declaration that the provisions of 43 C.F.R. §§ 3833.3, 3833.4(a) (and certain regulations allegedly related thereto), and 3833.5(d) are “in excess of statutory jurisdiction, authority, or limitations, or short of statutory right” and thus unlawful under 5 U.S.C. § 706(2)(C). Appellants also seek injunctive relief. This appeal follows the district court’s grant of the Secretary of Interior’s cross-motion for summary judgment.

I

The Mining Act of 1872, 17 Stat. 91, set out procedures by which any person could locate, perfect, or claim valuable mineral…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Mourning v. Family Publications Service, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co. v. TrainSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. Boesche v. UdallSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. Davis v. NelsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1964
  5. Topaz Beryllium Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Utah · 1979

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. United States v. Iron Mountain Mines, Inc.District Court, E.D. California · 1997
  2. Goldfield Mines, Inc. v. HandCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1985
  3. Jackson v. RobertsonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1985
  4. Oregon Portland Cement Co. v. United States Department of the InteriorDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 1984
  5. Jackson v. RobertsonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1985

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API