Jackson v. Robertson
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
SETH, Circuit Judge.
This is an appeal from the trial court’s order fixing ownership interests in mining claims on federal land. Appellants, defendants below, raise two questions of federal statutory interpretation. They urge that *1179provisions of 43 U.S.C. § 1744 (The 1976 Land Act) operate to void the interests of all appellees. Appellants also contend that many of the appellees forfeited any ownership interest in the claims by failing to contribute their share of the cost of the annual assessment work under 30 U.S.C. § 28 when appellants sought to “publish them out.” Additionally appellants…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- United States v. LockeSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Brewster v. Lanyon Zinc Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1905
- Turner v. SawyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Lindeke v. Associates Realty Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1906
- Elder v. Horseshoe Mining & Milling Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1904
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Commercial Financial Services, Inc. v. Jones (In Re Commercial Financial Services, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 2000
- Jackson v. RobertsonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1985
- Cornwall v. BairdAlaska Supreme Court · 1986