Legal Opinion

Rees v. Adams

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided December 17, 1929No. 18931PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BENNETT, C.

Defendants in error, as plaintiffs, brought suit against plaintiffs in error, as defendants, to cancel a certain coal mining lease and to quiet title to a farm of 160 acres in LeFlore county, Okla. The parties will be referred to as they appeared in the trial court. Upon a trial to the court there was a judgment for plaintiffs, from which defendants appeal.

It appears that December 18, 1922, Sam McKinney, Harry Wallis and J. N. Adams, the then owners of said land, executed thereon a coal mining lease upon a royalty basis to J. D. Bennight. There was already opened up and in working…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Anthis v. Sullivan Oil & Gas Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
  2. Fox Petroleum Co. v. BookerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
  3. Jones v. Moncrief-Cook Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
  4. Morgan v. McGeeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
  5. St. Louis-S. F. Ry. Co. v. SimmonsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Wade v. LillardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1949
  2. Junes & Spicer v. Advance-Rumley Thresher Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API