Legal Opinion

Pagan-San Miguel v. United States

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided November 20, 2013No. 19-1625PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Per curiam

Petitioner Carlos Pagan-San-Miguel seeks leave to file a second or successive petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. He relies upon the Supreme Court’s recent decisions in Missouri v. Frye, — U.S. -, 132 S.Ct. 1399, 182 L.Ed.2d 379 (2012), and Lafler v. Cooper, — U.S.-, 132 S.Ct. 1376, 182 L.Ed.2d 398 (2012), and upon Martinez v. Ryan, — U.S.-, 132 S.Ct. 1309, 182 L.Ed.2d 272 (2012), and Trevino v. Thaler, — U.S.-, 133 S.Ct. 1911, 185 L.Ed.2d 1044 (2013). However, none of those cases establishes a “new rule of constitutional law, made retroactive to cases on collateral review,” as 28 U.S.C. §…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Hill v. LockhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Martinez v. RyanSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
  4. Lafler v. CooperSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
  5. Missouri v. FryeSupreme Court of the United States · 2012

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Bucci v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2015
  2. Moody v. LumpkinCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2023
  3. United States v. Michael St. HubertCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2019
  4. Winward v. StateUtah Supreme Court · 2015
  5. In re: ClarkCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2016

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API