Pagan-San Miguel v. United States
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
1Per curiam
Petitioner Carlos Pagan-San-Miguel seeks leave to file a second or successive petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. He relies upon the Supreme Court’s recent decisions in Missouri v. Frye, — U.S. -, 132 S.Ct. 1399, 182 L.Ed.2d 379 (2012), and Lafler v. Cooper, — U.S.-, 132 S.Ct. 1376, 182 L.Ed.2d 398 (2012), and upon Martinez v. Ryan, — U.S.-, 132 S.Ct. 1309, 182 L.Ed.2d 272 (2012), and Trevino v. Thaler, — U.S.-, 133 S.Ct. 1911, 185 L.Ed.2d 1044 (2013). However, none of those cases establishes a “new rule of constitutional law, made retroactive to cases on collateral review,” as 28 U.S.C. §…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Hill v. LockhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Martinez v. RyanSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
- Lafler v. CooperSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
- Missouri v. FryeSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Bucci v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2015
- Moody v. LumpkinCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2023
- United States v. Michael St. HubertCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2019
- Winward v. StateUtah Supreme Court · 2015
- In re: ClarkCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2016
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.