Legal Opinion

In Re Arbitration Between Associated Metals & Minerals Corp. & Kemikalija

New York Court of Appeals

Decided November 16, 1961PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtFuld, J.

In May of 1957, Kemikalija, Import-Export, as seller, and Associated Metals & Minerals Corporation, as buyer, entered into a contract for the sale of barytes. The contract contained an arbitration clause in which it was agreed that “ Any controversy or claim arising out of, or relating to this contract, or to the breach thereof shall be settled by arbitration ’ ’. For the goods delivered, Associated paid all but some $18,000. That amount remaining unpaid without explanation for about a year and a half, Kemikalija in January of 1960 demanded arbitration.

A month later, Associated brought the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Matter of Kramer Uchitelle, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1942
  2. Newburger v. LubellNew York Court of Appeals · 1931
  3. Matter of Hosiery Mfrs. Corp. v. . GoldstonNew York Court of Appeals · 1924
  4. Wickwire Spencer Steel Co. v. Kemkit Scientific Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1944
  5. Alpert v. Admiration Knitwear Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1952

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Morris v. ReynoldsDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API