Legal Opinion

Morris v. Reynolds

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided August 3, 2000No. 98 Civ.5439 VMPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION AND ORDER

MARRERO, District Judge.

George Morris (“Morris” or “Petitioner”) petitions for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. In support, Morris alleges that after he had entered a plea of guilty to a misdemeanor charge on which he was indicted, a state trial court judge improperly reinstated a previously dismissed felony count in the same indictment. Morris argues that such reinstatement violated his constitutional right under thé Fifth Amendment of the United States Constitution not to be twice put in jeopardy. The Magistrate Judge, to whom the petition was…

2Cases cited44 opinions

  1. Coppedge v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. Picard v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. Brown v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  5. Duncan v. HenrySupreme Court of the United States · 1995

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. George Morris v. Edward Reynolds, Superintendent of Mohawk Correctional FacilityCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API