Legal Opinion

Pierce County v. State

Washington Supreme Court

Decided October 30, 2003No. 73607-3PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[As amended by order of the Supreme Court March 9, 2004],

Owens, J.

In November 2002, voters passed another $30 license tab initiative, Initiative Measure 776 (1-776).1 In February 2003, the King County Superior Court declared 1-776 unconstitutional on the grounds that it embraced more than a single subject and substantially impaired King County’s contractual obligations to its bondholders. This court accepted direct review. Because we conclude that 1-776 did not violate the Washington State Constitution, we reverse the superior court’s grant of summary judgment and remand for proceedings…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Amalgamated Transit Union Local 587 v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Fritz v. GortonWashington Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Washington Federation of State Employees v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Kueckelhan v. Federal Old Line InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1966
  5. Citizens for Responsible Wildlife Management v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 2003

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. Pierce County v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Sheehan v. Central Puget Sound Regional Transit AuthorityWashington Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Sheehan v. SOUND TRANSIT AUTH.Washington Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Pierce County v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 2006
  5. Pierce County v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 2006

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API