Legal Opinion

Sheehan v. SOUND TRANSIT AUTH.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided November 10, 2005No. 76036-5PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

123 P.3d 88 (2005)

155 Wash.2d 790

Patrick J. SHEEHAN and James T. Reynolds, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Appellants,

v.

CENTRAL PUGET SOUND REGIONAL TRANSIT AUTHORITY, a Washington municipal corporation, Seattle Popular Monorail Authority, a Washington municipal corporation, and State of Washington, Respondents.

No. 76036-5.

Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc.

Argued May 19, 2005.

Decided November 10, 2005.

James Alexander Smith, James R. Hennessey, Jeffrey Walton Thomas, Smith & Hennessey PLLC, Jeffrey Walton Thomas, Thomas Law Offices, Seattle, for Appellants.

Paul J.…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited48 opinions

  1. Department of Ecology v. Campbell & Gwinn, L.L.C.Washington Supreme Court · 2002
  2. State, Dept. of Ecology v. Campbell & GwinnWashington Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Cowiche Canyon Conservancy v. BosleyWashington Supreme Court · 1992
  4. State v. J.P.Washington Supreme Court · 2003
  5. Jones v. Allstate InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 2002

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. HomeStreet, Inc. v. STATE, DEPT. OF REVENUEWashington Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Biggers v. City of Bainbridge IslandWashington Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Larson v. Seattle Popular Monorail AuthorityWashington Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Larson v. Seattle Popular Monorail Auth.Washington Supreme Court · 2006
  5. Sourakli v. Kyriakos, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2008

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API