Legal Opinion

Sheehan v. Central Puget Sound Regional Transit Authority

Washington Supreme Court

Decided November 10, 2005No. 76036-5PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

¶1 Owens, J.

Patrick Sheehan and James Reynolds (Appellants) seek reversal of the trial court’s decision to dismiss, upon motion for summary judgment, all of their claims challenging the motor vehicle excise taxes (MVET) levied and collected by respondents Central Puget Sound Regional Transit Authority (Sound Transit) and Seattle Popular Monorail Authority (the Monorail) (collectively, the Authorities). Appellants also assign error to the trial court’s decision to defer a ruling on their CR 23 motion for class certification until final disposition of the parties’ cross motions for summary…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Department of Ecology v. Campbell & Gwinn, L.L.C.Washington Supreme Court · 2002
  2. State, Dept. of Ecology v. Campbell & GwinnWashington Supreme Court · 2002
  3. State v. J.P.Washington Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Jones v. Allstate InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Jones v. Allstate Ins. Co.Washington Supreme Court · 2002

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. HomeStreet, Inc. v. STATE, DEPT. OF REVENUEWashington Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Biggers v. City of Bainbridge IslandWashington Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Sheehan v. SOUND TRANSIT AUTH.Washington Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Larson v. Seattle Popular Monorail AuthorityWashington Supreme Court · 2006
  5. Larson v. Seattle Popular Monorail Auth.Washington Supreme Court · 2006

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API