Legal Opinion
People v. Superior Court (Moore)
California Court of Appeal
Decided August 6, 1996No. A072370PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
McGUINESS, J. *
In Baldwin v. Department of Motor Vehicles (1995) 35 Cal.App.4th 1630 [42 Cal.Rptr.2d 422] (Baldwin), we held that the Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV) did not violate principles of double jeopardy when it revoked Mr. Baldwin’s driver’s license after it received notice of his third conviction for driving under the influence of alcohol. We analyzed the United States Supreme Court’s opinions in Department of Revenue of Mont. v. Kurth Ranch (1994) 511 U.S. 767 [128 L.Ed.2d 767, 114 S.Ct. 1937] (Kurth Ranch), and United States v. Halper (1989) 490 U.S. 435 [104 L.Ed.2d…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Auto Equity Sales, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
- United States v. HalperSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Austin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Helvering v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- United States v. UrserySupreme Court of the United States · 1996
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- People v. BrackenAppellate Division of the Superior Court of California · 2000
- People v. BrackenCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
- Betancourt v. Storke Housing InvestorsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
- Magill v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
- Marentes v. Impac Funding Corp. CA4/2California Court of Appeal · 2020
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.