State v. Nunez
New Mexico Supreme Court
1DissentSerna, Justice
{128} I must respectfully DISSENT. Under the majority opinion, New Mexico stands alone from both the federal analysis and the analysis of other states, despite the fact that Ursery has been examined by numerous state courts. In its radical departure, the majority even goes much further than the proposed analysis by Justice Stevens, the only Justice on the United States Supreme Court who dissented from Ursery. Ultimately, I am not persuaded that we should reject Ursery, and even if I were, I believe the opinion errs by creating a constitutionally protected property right to drug proceeds.
I.…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited91 opinions
- Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- United States v. LeonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Aguilar v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Spinelli v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
86 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.