Legal Opinion

McGreevy v. Racal-Dana Instruments, Inc.

District Court, E.D. Virginia

Decided July 8, 1988No. Civ. A. 88-0300-APublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

ELLIS, District Judge.

This is essentially an employment contract dispute. It presents the question, unsettled in this jurisdiction, whether there exists an “employer intentional tort exception” to the exclusivity provision of the Virginia Worker’s Compensation Act (WCA). 1 Given that the WCA is modeled after the Indiana Act and that the courts of that state, for manifestly sound reasons, have adopted such an exception, this Court does so here. Thus where an employer commits an intentional tort with the intent to injure an employee, this Court concludes that an action by that…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Blankenship v. Cincinnati Milacron Chemicals, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Feitig v. ChalkleySupreme Court of Virginia · 1946
  3. Pleasant v. JohnsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
  4. Beauchamp v. Dow Chemical Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Conner v. BraggSupreme Court of Virginia · 1962

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Ball v. Joy Manufacturing Co.District Court, S.D. West Virginia · 1990
  2. Blailock v. O'BANNONMississippi Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Davis Ex Rel. Davis v. CMS Continental Natural Gas, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2001
  4. Miller v. Washington Workplace, Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2004
  5. Spencer v. General Electric Co.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 1988

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API