Feitig v. Chalkley
Supreme Court of Virginia
1Opinion of the CourtHudgins, J.
Prior to the original opinion in this case, reported in 184 Va. 553, 35 S. E. (2d) 827, this court had not considered whether the Virginia Workmen’s Compensation Act (Michie’s Code 1942, secs. 1887 (1) et seq.) prohibited an injured employee from maintaining an action at law against his co-employee for negligence or wrong causing the injuries. We thought that the importance of the questions required a more thorough investigation than appeared in the arguments and briefs of counsel on the original presentation, hence we *98granted a rehearing but limited the argument to this single question. >
The…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Bresnahan v. BarreMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1934
- Zimmer v. CaseySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
- Noblin v. Randolph Corp.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1942
- Morrow v. Hume, Admx.Ohio Supreme Court · 1936
- Griffith v. Raven Red Ash Coal Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1942
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by136 opinions
- Morris v. MorrisSupreme Court of Virginia · 1989
- George G. Allman v. W. H. HanleyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1962
- Henderson v. Central Tel. Co. of VirginiaSupreme Court of Virginia · 1987
- Sykes v. Stone & Webster Engineering Corp.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1947
- Fauver v. BellSupreme Court of Virginia · 1951
131 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.