Legal Opinion
Dowd v. Law Plan Hyatt Legal Services
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided April 27, 1998PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—In two related actions to recover damages for legal malpractice, Mary L. Dowd, the plaintiff in both actions, appeals, as limited by her brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (G. Aronin, J.), dated October 7, 1996, as granted the cross motions of the defendants Joseph Edward Brady, individually and d/b/a Joseph Edward Brady, P. C., and Victor Roger Rubin and Louis Bacotti, individually and d/b/a Bacotti and Rubin, to dismiss the complaints insofar as asserted against them in both actions as barred by the Statute of Limitations, and Law Plan Hyatt Legal Services…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Enco Associates, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1977
- Santulli v. Englert, Reilly & McHugh, P. C.New York Court of Appeals · 1992
- Ruffolo v. GarbariniAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- Rome v. SchmidtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
3Cited by5 opinions
- Budget Installment Corp. v. Levy, Ehrlich & KronenbergAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- Kelly v. Cesarano, Haque & Khan, P. C.New York Supreme Court · 1998
- Berman v. Cullen & DykmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- Daughtry v. RosengartenAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1999
- Berman v. Cullen & DykmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002