Legal Opinion

Daughtry v. Rosengarten

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided March 19, 1999PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

Order unanimously affirmed without costs.

Plaintiff concedes that she did not schedule the instant cause of action for legal malpractice against defendant as an unliquidated asset in her bankruptcy petition, although said cause of action by plaintiffs own admission accrued prior to the close of the bankruptcy proceedings. Where a bankrupt fails to schedule assets disclosing all tangible and intangible property including causes of action which accrued prior to the termination of the bankruptcy proceedings, title to the assets remains the property of the bankruptcy…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. City of New York v. StateNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
  2. Dynamics Corp. of America v. Marine Midland Bank-New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
  3. Phoenix Garden Restaurant, Inc. v. ChuAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  4. Quiros v. PolowAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
  5. Ruffolo v. GarbariniAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Moran Enters., Inc. v. HurstAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API