Legal Opinion

Phaidin v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided May 5, 1993No. 91-959CPublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MARGOLIS, Judge.

This case is before the court on defendant’s motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction and for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. The plaintiff is a citizen of the Republic of Ireland and a former employee of the United States Embassy in Dublin, Ireland. She claims she was unlawfully terminated from her position and seeks damages against the defendant, the United States, for breach of an employment contract and for alleged deprivation of Irish social insurance bene*233fits. The defendant argues that the plaintiff never had an…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Karen S. Reynolds v. Army and Air Force Exchange ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
  4. Eastport Steamship Corporation v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1967
  5. United States v. FaustoSupreme Court of the United States · 1988

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Pikulin v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
  2. Edelmann v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007
  3. Rosner v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2002
  4. Smalls v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
  5. Kawa v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API