Crouse-Prouty v. Rogers
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, and from an order denying a new trial. Lewis R. Works, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtConrey, P. J.
This is an appeal by the defendants from a judgment quieting plaintiff’s title to the lot described in the complaint, and from an order denying the motion of defendants for a new trial. There was a former trial of the action and a decision by this court affirming an order granting a new trial. In that decision there is a statement of facts, and we will repeat here that portion thereof which is identical with the facts proved at the second trial (13 Cal. App. 561, [110 Pac. 142]):
“On December 26, 1885, Andrew Glassell, who was the common source of title, entered into a contract with Ralph and…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Murphy v. CrowleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
- Luco v. De ToroCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Ions v. HarbisonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- Jones v. JonesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
- Karns v. OlneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Secret Valley Land Co. v. PerryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
- Huntoon v. Southern Trust & Commerce BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
- Security First National Bank v. RossCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
- Howe v. MessimerMontana Supreme Court · 1929
- Wareham v. RandolphCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.