Legal Opinion

Howe v. Messimer

Montana Supreme Court

Decided March 8, 1929No. 6,386PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Matthews

Plaintiff brought action against defendant on two promissory notes, for $2,000 each, made and delivered to Jacob and Anna Elston, of Elmira, New York, and assigned to plaintiff after maturity. Defendant admitted the execution and delivery of the notes and set up three alleged affirmative defenses, to-wit, conditional delivery, fraud and misrepresentation, and want of consideration, combined in the following allegations:

That, as owners of a certain lot in Miami, Florida, the Elstons represented to defendant that the lot was worth, and could be readily sold for, a sum in excess of $5,000, and…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Lee v. Stockmen's National BankMontana Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Carey v. GuestMontana Supreme Court · 1927
  3. State ex rel. Arthurs v. Board of County CommissionersMontana Supreme Court · 1911
  4. Courtney v. GordonMontana Supreme Court · 1925
  5. Leonard v. OsburnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Neel v. First Federal Savings & Loan Assoc.Montana Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Fleming v. Fleming Farms, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Marinkovich v. TierneyMontana Supreme Court · 1932
  4. Hodgkiss v. Northland Petroleum ConsolidatedMontana Supreme Court · 1937
  5. Roberts v. Mission Valley Concrete Industries, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1986

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API