Legal Opinion

In Re United States Department of Defense

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided June 3, 1988No. 88-5044PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion for the Court filed by Chief Judge WALD.

Dissenting opinion filed by Circuit Judge STARR.

WALD, Chief Judge:

The Department of Defense (“DOD”) petitions here for a writ of mandamus directing District Judge Louis F. Oberdorfer to revoke the appointment of a special master in this Freedom of Information Act (“FOIA”) case. Because we conclude that Judge Oberdorfer did not abuse his discretion in appointing the master, we deny the petition.

I. Background

This petition arises from a lawsuit brought under FOIA1 by the Washington Post and staff writer R. Scott Armstrong seeking to compel…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Kerr v. United States Dist. Court for Northern Dist. of Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Robert G. Vaughn v. Bernard Rosen, Executive Director, United States Civil Service CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1973
  3. Will v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. Roche v. Evaporated Milk Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
  5. Gulfstream Aerospace Corp. v. Mayacamas Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. In Re United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1989
  2. In Re Richard ThornburghCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1989
  3. In Re Bituminous Coal Operators' Association, IncCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1991
  4. National Resources Defense Council v. United States Department of DefenseDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2005
  5. Washington Post v. United States Department of DefenseDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1991

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API