In Re Richard Thornburgh
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion for the court filed by Chief Judge WALD.
WALD, Chief Judge:
Petitioners, Richard Thornburgh et al., 1 are defendants in an action now pending in the district court, in which four organizations and five “Doe” individual aliens (“plaintiffs”), purporting to represent a class of similarly-situated aliens, challenged a regulation of the Immigration and Naturalization Service (“INS”) and sought remedies for alleged injuries to their rights as a consequence of the allegedly invalid regulation. Having ruled that the INS regulation was invalid, the district court entered two orders of referral…
2Cases cited44 opinions
- Allen v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Valley Forge Christian College v. Americans United for Separation of Church and State, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Hunt v. Washington State Apple Advertising CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Kerr v. United States Dist. Court for Northern Dist. of Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
- United States Parole Commission v. GeraghtySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by56 opinions
- Kelly N. Pryor Warren E. Spivey, Jr., Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated v. National Collegiate Athletic AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2002
- Florida Audubon Society v. Lloyd M. Bentsen, Secretary of the Treasury, and Margaret Richardson, Commissioner of the Internal Revenue ServiceCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1996
- Mountain States Legal Foundation v. Dan Glickman, Secretary of AgricultureCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1996
- LA Engy & Power Auth v. FERCCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1998
- Republic of Venezuela v. Philip Morris IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2002
51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.