Legal Opinion
United States v. Soto
Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces
Decided January 21, 2011No. 10-0397/ARPublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Judge RYAN
delivered the opinion of the Court.
Pursuant to his pleas, Appellant was found guilty by a military judge sitting as a special court-martial of two specifications of absence without leave, and one specification each of the following: making a false official statement, damaging property, and larceny, in violation of Articles 86, 107, 109, and 121, Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), 10 U.S.C. §§ 886, 907, 909, 921 (2006). Appellant was sentenced to a reduction to the grade of E-l, confinement for two months, and a bad-conduct discharge. Per the terms of the pretrial agreement,…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Brady v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- McCarthy v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- United States v. InabinetteCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2008
- United States v. KingUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1977
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- United States v. RileyCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2013
- United States v. FieldsUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 2015
- United States v. Specialist JEREMY H. HAVERYArmy Court of Criminal Appeals · 2017
- United States v. Captain ELMO E. VANCEArmy Court of Criminal Appeals · 2020
- United States v. CarrilloNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 2019
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.