United States v. Specialist JEREMY H. HAVERY
Army Court of Criminal Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
PENLAND, Judge:
While we affirm the conviction and sentence in this case, we make this decision in precedential fashion in order to emphasize a fundamental requirement: the terms and conditions of a pretrial agreement must be reduced to writing.
A military judge sitting as a general court-martial convicted appellant, pursuant to his pleas, of four specifications of assault consummated by battery, in violation of Article 128, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 928 (2012) [hereinafter UCMJ]. With the exception of adjudged forfeitures, the military judge sentenced…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- United States v. CareUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1969
- United States v. PerronCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2003
- United States v. RileyCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2013
- United States v. PartinUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1979
- United States v. SotoCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2011
3Cited by1 opinion
- United States v. Specialist JEFFERSON C. WASHINGTONArmy Court of Criminal Appeals · 2017