Legal Opinion

United States v. Specialist JEREMY H. HAVERY

Army Court of Criminal Appeals

Decided February 22, 2017No. ARMY 20160133PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

PENLAND, Judge:

While we affirm the conviction and sentence in this case, we make this decision in precedential fashion in order to emphasize a fundamental requirement: the terms and conditions of a pretrial agreement must be reduced to writing.

A military judge sitting as a general court-martial convicted appellant, pursuant to his pleas, of four specifications of assault consummated by battery, in violation of Article 128, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 928 (2012) [hereinafter UCMJ]. With the exception of adjudged forfeitures, the military judge sentenced…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United States v. CareUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1969
  2. United States v. PerronCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2003
  3. United States v. RileyCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2013
  4. United States v. PartinUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1979
  5. United States v. SotoCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2011

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. United States v. Specialist JEFFERSON C. WASHINGTONArmy Court of Criminal Appeals · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API