Legal Opinion
BellSouth Mobility v. Miami-Dade County, Florida
District Court, S.D. Florida
Decided March 30, 2001No. 98-2724CIVJORDANPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Order Denying BellSouth’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment and Granting Miami-Dade County’s Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment
JORDAN, District Judge.
BellSouth Mobility filed suit against Miami-Dade County seeking declaratory and injunctive relief for the County’s alleged violations of the Telecommunications Act of 1996, 47 U.S.C. § 151, et seq., and 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Jurisdiction is proper under 47 U.S.C. § 332(c)(7)(B)(v) and 28 U.S.C. § 1331. BellSouth moved for partial summary judgment, arguing that the County’s denial of its application for an unusual use exception was not supported by…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- De Groot v. SheffieldSupreme Court of Florida · 1957
- Hilburn v. Murata Electronics North America, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1999
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- AllEnergy Corporation v. Trempealeau County Environment & Land Use CommitteeWisconsin Supreme Court · 2017
- City of Rancho Palos Verdes v. AbramsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
- AllEnergy Corporation v. Trempealeau County Environment & Land Use CommitteeWisconsin Supreme Court · 2017
- Dougherty ex rel. Eisenberg v. City of MiamiDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2009