Legal Opinion

City of Rancho Palos Verdes v. Abrams

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 11, 2002No. B151086PublishedCited by 6 opinions

[Opinion certified for partial publication.*]

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

MALLANO, J.

The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) licensed an amateur radio operator to use certain frequencies for commercial purposes. The City of Rancho Palos Verdes, where the operator resides and his city-approved radio antennae are located, requires a radio operator to obtain a city permit for such usage. The city denied the permit.

Thereafter, upon application by the city, the trial court issued a permanent injunction, prohibiting the radio operator from using any frequencies commercially without the city permit. The operator contends that federal communications law preempts…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. United States v. Southwestern Cable Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Head v. New Mexico Board of Examiners in OptometrySupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Cellular Telephone Company, Doing Business as at & T Wireless Services v. The Town of Oyster Bay and the Town Board of the Town of Oyster BayCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
  4. Town of Amherst v. Omnipoint Communications Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1999
  5. Preferred Sites, LLC v. Troup CountyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2002

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. City of Rancho Palos Verdes v. AbramsSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  2. Kay v. City of Rancho Palos VerdesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
  3. City of Rancho Palos Verdes v. AbramsSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  4. Kay v. Rancho Palos VerdesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
  5. Opinion No., Texas Attorney General Reports2008

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API