Legal Opinion
Radley v. Commonwealth
Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)
Decided June 20, 1944PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion of the Court by
Chief Justice Fulton
Affirming.
In this action the Commonwealth obtained judgment for unemployment compensation taxes against the appellants, Carl Radley and John Enzweiler, partners, doing business as “The Dot-Knight Cab Company.”
The defense was that the appellants were not subject employers under the Unemployment Compensation Law, KRS 341.010 et seq., but were engaged in the business of leasing taxicabs to independent operators.
The sole question presented is whether the drivers of the appellants’ taxicabs were employees or independent contractors'. If they were…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Jones v. GoodsonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1941
- Lassen v. Stamford Transit Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1925
- Kaus v. Unemployment Compensation CommissionSupreme Court of Iowa · 1941
- Meridian Taxicab Co., Inc. v. WardMississippi Supreme Court · 1939
- In Re the Appeals of Farwest Taxi Service, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1941
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Parks Cab Co. v. AnnunzioIllinois Supreme Court · 1952
- Read v. Warkentin, CommissionerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1959
- Nazario v. VélezSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1969
- United States v. T. S. Fleming and James E. Fleming, Jr., D/B/A City Transportation Company, and City Transportation Company of TylerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1961
- Young v. Indiana Employment Security BoardIndiana Court of Appeals · 1963
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.