Legal Opinion
Aghnides v. Goodrie
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided March 31, 1954No. 10910_1PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LINDLEY, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiff’s suit for infringement of his patent 2,210,846, applied for in the United States December 31, 1937, and in Belgium December 8, 1934, and allowed August 6, 1940, having resulted in a judgment of invalidity and dismissal of the action, he brings this appeal.
The device of the patent is not complicated in structure or operation. The inventor described it as a “fluid mixing device,” “for intimately mixing a gas-with a fluid.” Apparently the only practical use experienced has been in mixing air and water, or “aerating water.” Claim 1 which is typical of all, five…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Graver Tank & Mfg. Co. v. Linde Air Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Charles Peckat Mfg. Co. v. JacobsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1950
- Hazeltine Research, Inc. v. Admiral Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1950
- Falkenberg v. GoldingCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1952
- Sales Affiliates, Inc. v. National Mineral Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1949
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- S. H. Kress & Company v. Elie P. Aghnides and Chase Brass & Copper Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1957
- Helms Products, Inc. v. Lake Shore Manufacturing Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1955
- Elie P. Aghnides and Chase Brass and Copper Company, Inc. v. Orloff W. Holden and Marguerite Holden, Doing Business as Knickerbocker Rubber CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1955
- Aghnides v. SH Kress and CompanyDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 1956
- Aghnides v. FW Woolworth CompanyDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1971
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.