Aghnides v. FW Woolworth Company
District Court, D. Maryland
1Opinion of the Court
NORTHROP, Chief Judge.
To one not overly familiar with the mysteries of patent law, the trial of a patent infringement suit must be a baffling ritual indeed. More often than not, the evidence — testimonial, documentary, and demonstrative — is so voluminous • that it could fill a bottomless pit. Indeed, this Court has frequently, in a jocular vein, accused patent counsel of throwing everything into a case, including the kitchen sink. Sure enough, a case has finally come along in which counsel have thrown in a real, functioning kitchen sink, complete with its own self-contained three gallon…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Roberts v. RyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
- Computing Scale Co. of America v. Automatic Scale Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1907
- Gulf Smokeless Coal Co. v. Sutton, Steele & Steele.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1929
- S. H. Kress & Company v. Elie P. Aghnides and Chase Brass & Copper Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1957
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Seneca Constitutional Rights Organization v. GeorgeDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1972
- Blohm & Voss AG v. Prudential-Grace Lines, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 1972
- Aghnides v. F. W. Woolworth CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1973
- Ward Machinery Co. v. WM. C. Staley Machinery Corp.District Court, D. Maryland · 1976