New Amsterdam Casualty Co. v. Utility Battery Manufacturing Co.
Supreme Court of Florida
1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.
This is a suit on a bond given by the complainant in a suit for receivership, accounting, etc., to obtain, or make effective', the appointment by the Circuit Court of a receiver of the Utility Battery Manufacturing Company, a corporation, the New Amsterdam Casualty Company being a surety on the bond.
C. E. Yocam and. wife filed a bill of complaint against the Utility Battery Manufacturing Company, Arnold S. Kirkeby, E. O. Kirkeby and H. D. Wentworth, charging violation of a contract between Yocam and the Kirkebys with reference to said Company, misappropriation of company funds by the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Central Coal & Coke Co. v. HartmanCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1901
- Sparks v. McCrearySupreme Court of Alabama · 1908
- Orlando Orange Groves Co. v. HaleSupreme Court of Florida · 1935
- Morrow v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1909
- Hodges v. A. P. Fries & Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1894
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by64 opinions
- WW Gay Mech. Contr., Inc. v. Wharfside Two, Ltd.Supreme Court of Florida · 1989
- RA Jones & Sons, Inc. v. HolmanDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985
- Conner v. Atlas Aircraft CorporationDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1975
- 76 Fair empl.prac.cas. (Bna) 1745, 72 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 45,113, 47 Fed. R. Evid. Serv. 1389, 11 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. C 659 Michael J. Eskra, Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant, Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Provident Life and Accident Insurance Company, Defendant-Counter-Claimant, Appellant/cross-Appellee. Michael J. Eskra, Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant-Appellee v. Provident Life and Accident Insurance Company, Defendant-Counterclaimant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1998
- Nebula Glass International, Inc. v. Reichhold, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2006
59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.