Arrington v. Robertson
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
MARIS, Circuit Judge.
The sole question presented on this appeal is whether it was reversible error for the trial judge, in the absence of counsel for the parties and without notice to them, to send instructions in writing to the jury, pursuant to an inquiry by them, after they had retired from the court room and while they were in the jury room deliberating upon their verdict. , The instructions thus given consisted of a copy of two points for charge which had been presented by the plaintiffs at the close of the trial judge’s charge, affirmed by him and excepted to by the defendant. The…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Hopt v. People of Territory of UtahSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Fillippon v. Albion Vein Slate Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1919
- Shields v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Stewart v. Wyoming Cattle Ranche Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Ah Fook Chang v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1937
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- United States v. David T. DellingerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1973
- Theodore Chester Kulas v. Jaime FloresCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Lawrence Rice and Walter Chipman v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1966
- Chicago, Rock Island and Pacific Railroad Company v. Dallas D. Speth and Olin Mathieson Chemical CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1968
- Rueth v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 1978
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.