Legal Opinion

Pollock v. Searcy

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided September 18, 1991No. 17471PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PREWITT, Presiding Judge.

Plaintiffs sought damages from defendants as a result of a motor vehicle collision. Defendant Searcy was the operator of a motor vehicle which collided with a vehicle operated by plaintiff Donald Pollock. Farmers Insurance Company (Farmers) is plaintiffs’ insurance carrier, providing plaintiffs with underinsured motorist coverage. Farmers was made a defendant by plaintiffs on the theory that Searcy was *277underinsured, making Farmers liable for damages in excess of Searcy’s coverage.

On motion by Farmers, the claim against it was severed from the claim against Sear-cy.…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Berry v. Federal Kemper Insurance Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1981
  2. Protective Casualty Insurance Co. v. CookMissouri Court of Appeals · 1987
  3. Annin v. Bi-State Development AgencyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1983
  4. Finninger v. JohnsonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1985
  5. Frost v. WhiteMissouri Court of Appeals · 1989

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Charles v. Consumers InsuranceMissouri Court of Appeals · 2012
  2. Ivy v. HawkSupreme Court of Missouri · 1994
  3. State v. TaylorMissouri Court of Appeals · 1996
  4. State v. WilliamsMissouri Court of Appeals · 2001
  5. State v. TaylorMissouri Court of Appeals · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API