Pollock v. Searcy
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
PREWITT, Presiding Judge.
Plaintiffs sought damages from defendants as a result of a motor vehicle collision. Defendant Searcy was the operator of a motor vehicle which collided with a vehicle operated by plaintiff Donald Pollock. Farmers Insurance Company (Farmers) is plaintiffs’ insurance carrier, providing plaintiffs with underinsured motorist coverage. Farmers was made a defendant by plaintiffs on the theory that Searcy was *277underinsured, making Farmers liable for damages in excess of Searcy’s coverage.
On motion by Farmers, the claim against it was severed from the claim against Sear-cy.…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Berry v. Federal Kemper Insurance Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1981
- Protective Casualty Insurance Co. v. CookMissouri Court of Appeals · 1987
- Annin v. Bi-State Development AgencyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1983
- Finninger v. JohnsonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1985
- Frost v. WhiteMissouri Court of Appeals · 1989
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Charles v. Consumers InsuranceMissouri Court of Appeals · 2012
- Ivy v. HawkSupreme Court of Missouri · 1994
- State v. TaylorMissouri Court of Appeals · 1996
- State v. WilliamsMissouri Court of Appeals · 2001
- State v. TaylorMissouri Court of Appeals · 1996