Legal Opinion

Annin v. Bi-State Development Agency

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided August 30, 1983No. 43606PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STEWART, Presiding Judge.

Defendant, Bi-State Development Agency, appeals from a judgment in a jury tried case awarding plaintiff damages for personal injuries and property damage resulting from an accident between an automobile that plaintiff was operating and a bus owned and operated by Bi-State. This cause was previously dismissed because the record then before us did not show the timely filing of a motion for new trial. Leave was granted to supplement the record. The supplementary record revealed that a timely motion had been filed. The dismissal was set aside and the cause was resubmitted.

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Bourne Ex Rel. Bourne v. ManleyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1968
  2. Houfburg v. Kansas City Stock Yards Co. of MaineSupreme Court of Missouri · 1955
  3. White v. BurkeybileSupreme Court of Missouri · 1965
  4. Kickham v. CarterSupreme Court of Missouri · 1960
  5. Gover v. Empire BankMissouri Court of Appeals · 1978

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Wilkerson v. PrelutskySupreme Court of Missouri · 1997
  2. Breeding v. Dodson Trailer Repair, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1984
  3. Missouri Commercial Investment Co. v. Employers Mutual Casualty Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1984
  4. Reed v. RopeMissouri Court of Appeals · 1991
  5. Goff v. St. Luke's Hospital of Kansas CitySupreme Court of Missouri · 1988

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API