Legal Opinion

State v. Taylor

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided August 20, 1996No. 18754, 20395PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*926PREWITT, Judge.

Following jury trial, Appellant was convicted of murder in the second degree and sentenced to life in prison. He appeals from that conviction. Thereafter Appellant filed a Rule 29.15 motion seeking to vacate the conviction. Following an evidentiary hearing, the motion was denied. Appellant also appeals from that denial. The appeals were consolidated here, pursuant to Rule 29.15(i).

Appellant presents two points relied on. The first point claims error in the criminal trial and the second point claims error in denying his Rule 29.15 motion. For his first point, Appellant contends…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Baber v. Commission on Retirement, Removal and DisciplineSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. State v. ErwinSupreme Court of Missouri · 1993
  3. State v. FordSupreme Court of Missouri · 1982
  4. State v. HamiltonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1958
  5. State v. MedleyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1979

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State v. RobertsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1997
  2. State v. ProvostSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
  3. State v. DavidsonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1997
  4. State v. BrownMissouri Court of Appeals · 1997
  5. State v. FinsterMissouri Court of Appeals · 1998

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API