Legal Opinion
Ivy v. Hawk
Supreme Court of Missouri
Decided June 21, 1994No. 76730PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
THOMAS, Judge.
Plaintiffs sued alleging injury as the result of negligent medical treatment. The jury entered a verdict in favor of the defendants. Plaintiffs appealed arguing that the trial court erred in denying their motion for new trial because of an error during voir dire. The Court of Appeals, Eastern District, affirmed the judgment and transferred the case to this Court pursuant to Rule 83.02. We reverse and remand for a new trial.
FACTS
Plaintiffs, Robert and Carol Ivy, brought a medical malpractice action against Brady 0. Hawk, M.D., individually, and against Brady 0. Hawk, M.D., Inc.…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Callahan v. Cardinal Glennon HospitalSupreme Court of Missouri · 1993
- Aiken Ex Rel. Aiken v. ClarySupreme Court of Missouri · 1965
- Coleman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1982
- Moore v. Middlewest Freightways, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1954
- Bunch v. CraderMissouri Court of Appeals · 1963
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Saint Louis University v. GearySupreme Court of Missouri · 2009
- Uptergrove v. Housing Authority of the City of LawsonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1996
- Strycharz v. BarlowMissouri Court of Appeals · 1995
- Roberson v. WestonMissouri Court of Appeals · 2008
- Rider ex rel. Rider v. Young Men's Christian Ass'n of Greater Kansas CityMissouri Court of Appeals · 2015
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.