Legal Opinion
HRA IN AND FOR CITY OF MINNEAPOLIS v. Froney
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided October 3, 1975No. 45509, 45279PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Per curiam
One of the respondents appeals from an order of the Hennepin County District Court directing that his property be included in condemnation proceedings and that commissioners be appointed to make an appropriate award. We affirm.
Appellant, George C. Froney, is the owner of a 1/9 interest and occupier of a home located at 643 Washington Street N. E., in the city of Minneapolis. In November 1966, the St. Anthony East Urban Renewal Plan was adopted by the Minneapolis City Council, which included appellant’s property within the project boundaries. However, originally appellant’s property was not…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- HOUSING & REDEVEL. AUTHOR. OF MINNEAPOLIS v. Mpls. Metropolitan Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1960
- HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF ST. PAUL v. GreenmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1959
- Asch v. Housing and Redevelopment AuthoritySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1959
- PORT AUTHORITY OF CITY OF ST. PAUL v. GroppoliSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1972
- Housing & Redevelopment Authority v. Coleman's Service, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1968
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Rio Vista Non-Profit Housing Corp. v. County of RamseySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- Minnesota Energy & Economic Development Authority v. PrintySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
- MINN. ENERGY & ECONOMIC DEV. AUTH. v. PrintySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984