Legal Opinion
PORT AUTHORITY OF CITY OF ST. PAUL v. Groppoli
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided November 17, 1972No. 43507PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MacLaughlin, Justice.
An action was commenced by the Port Authority of the City of St. Paul in January 1971 to condemn certain property owned by respondents. Respondents asserted that the petition for condemnation should be denied because the taking was not for a public purpose. The trial court found that the taking was for a public purpose and issued an order granting the petition. We granted respondents’ request for a discretionary review of the order of the trial court. The order is reversed.
The issue is whether the taking of respondents’ property by the Port Authority is for a public…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Visina v. FreemanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
- HOUSING & REDEVEL. AUTHOR. OF MINNEAPOLIS v. Mpls. Metropolitan Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1960
- HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF ST. PAUL v. GreenmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1959
- Asch v. Housing and Redevelopment AuthoritySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1959
- PORT AUTHORITY OF CITY OF ST. PAUL v. FisherSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1964
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- William Daniels and Judy Daniels v. The Area Plan Commission of Allen CountyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2002
- County of Blue Earth v. StauffenbergSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
- Cooperative Power Ass'n v. AasandSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
- HOUSING & REDEV. AUTH. OF CITY OF ST. PAUL v. SchapiroSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1973
- State Ex Rel. Powderly v. EricksonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.