Legal Opinion

Cortina v. Goya Foods, Inc.

District Court, S.D. California

Decided March 19, 2015No. Case No. 14-CV-169-L (NLS)PublishedCited by 52 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFFS’ FIRST AMENDED CONSOLIDATED COMPLAINT [DOC. 31]

M. JAMES LORENZ, District Judge.

This putative class action arises from Plaintiffs’ allegations that Defendant manufactured, advertised, and sold mislabeled beverages. Defendant now moves to dismiss all claims in the First Amended Consolidated Complaint (“FACC”) under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) and alternatively, to strike two of the three listed beverages from the FACC. Plaintiffs oppose.

For the following reasons, the Court GRANTS IN PART and DENIES…

2Cases cited48 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Hal Roach Studios, Inc., a Delaware Corporation v. Richard Feiner and Company, Inc., a New York CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
  4. Rice v. Santa Fe Elevator Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
  5. Navarro v. BlockCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by52 opinions

  1. Sciortino v. Pepsico, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2015
  2. McCoy v. Nestle USA, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2016
  3. Nissou-Rabban v. Capital One Bank (USA), N.A.District Court, S.D. California · 2018
  4. Gottesman v. SantanaDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2017
  5. Dana v. Hershey Co.District Court, N.D. California · 2016

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API