Hendrix v. Eighth & Walnut Corp.
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtKrupansky, J.
In this cause we are called upon to determine whether the Court of Appeals was correct in affirming the trial court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of appellees Eighth and Walnut and Dover.
Pursuant to Civ. R. 56(C), summary judgment may be granted when it appears from the evidence, “that reasonable minds can come to but one conclu*207sion and that conclusion is adverse to the party against whom the motion for summary judgment is made, such party being entitled to have the evidence or stipulation construed most strongly in his favor.” We must, therefore, construe the evidence most strongly in…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Shroades v. Rental Homes, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1981
- Cooper v. RooseOhio Supreme Court · 1949
- Berkowitz v. WinstonOhio Supreme Court · 1934
- Ripple v. Mahoning National BankOhio Supreme Court · 1944
- Kauffman v. First-Central Trust Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1949
3Cited by27 opinions
- Bundschu v. NaffahOhio Court of Appeals · 2002
- Tanguay v. MarstonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1986
- Sabitov v. GrainesOhio Court of Appeals · 2008
- Krichner v. Shooters on the Water, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2006
- Ogle v. KellyOhio Court of Appeals · 1993
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.