Legal Opinion

Kauffman v. First-Central Trust Co.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided April 20, 1949No. 31644PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtZimmerman, J.

As a preliminary observation it should be noted that although under the lease in question the lessor reserved certain rights of examination and inspection pertaining to the leased premises, the premises themselves were turned over to the lessee and were wholly within its possession and control. Moreover, the lessor made no agreement with respect to the maintenance and repair of the instrumentalities and facilities employed by the lessee in conducting its hotel business, and at the time the lease took effect the elevator involved was equipped in compliance with lawful requirements.

It is…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Flynn v. Pan American Hotel Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Garland v. StetsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
  3. Stone v. SullivanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1938
  4. Baier v. Cleveland Ry. Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1937
  5. Marcovitz v. HergenretherIllinois Supreme Court · 1922

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Jeffers v. OlexoOhio Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Federal Steel & Wire Corp. v. Ruhlin Construction Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Gelbman v. Second National BankOhio Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Feldman v. HowardOhio Supreme Court · 1967
  5. Logsdon v. Main-Nottingham Investment Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1956

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API