Legal Opinion

Ripple v. Mahoning National Bank

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided July 26, 1944No. 29915PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMatthias, J.

The demurrer presents but a single question of law: Where the owner of a building retains control over a suite of offices therein, leased to a tenant, “for the purpose of repairing the same and the doing of daily janitor work,” is such owner liable to an employee of his tenant, who is injured as a result of falling plaster which has been “defectively placed and installed on the base of said ceiling”?

The plaintiff argues that this case differs from the ordinary landlord and tenant case in that here the landlord of a large office .building has retained control over the various suites and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Berkowitz v. WinstonOhio Supreme Court · 1934
  2. Marqua v. MartinOhio Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Goodall v. DetersOhio Supreme Court · 1929

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Shroades v. Rental Homes, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Shump v. First Continental-Robinwood AssociatesOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Wills v. Frank Hoover SupplyOhio Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Cooper v. RooseOhio Supreme Court · 1949
  5. Mitchell v. Cleveland Electric Illuminating Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1987

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API