Bowles v. Oakman
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtClark, J.
Plaintiff Bowles sued on a promissory note, dated June 13, 1918, due in 90 days, for $873, payable to William S. Thomas and made by the defendant Oakman. Thomas was named payee for convenience. The note was one of a series owned by James Walker and his associates who had ventured into a land deal. Thomas indorsed the notes without recourse. Walker and his associates turned the note in'question, with other notes, over to Bates to be negotiated and used for their benefit. Bates indorsed in blank, and, in fraud of Walker and his associates, and in breach of trust, pledged the note in question…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Hays v. . HathornNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
- City Bank of New Haven v. . PerkinsNew York Court of Appeals · 1864
- Fehr v. CampbellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
- Kinney v. KruseWisconsin Supreme Court · 1871
- Caldwell v. LawrenceIllinois Supreme Court · 1876
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Livonia Properties Holdings, LLC v. 12840-12976 Farmington Road Holdings, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2010
- Livonia Property Holdings, L.L.C. v. 12840-12976 Farmington Road Holdings, L.L.C.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2010
- Marcuzzo v. Bank of the WestNebraska Supreme Court · 2015
- Talton v. BAC Home Loans Servicing LPDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2012
- DAGS II, LLC v. Huntington National BankCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2015
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.