Caldwell v. Lawrence
Illinois Supreme Court
Appeal from the Circuit Court of Warren county; the Hon. Arthur A. Smith, Judge, presiding.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Scott
All the objections taken to the judgment in this case are purely technical, and in no manner affect the merits of the cause. The action is upon a promissory note, payable to one D. K. Kness, and was by him indorsed and delivered to plaintiff. Both defendants pleaded the general issue, but one of them pleaded, specially, that plaintiff, for a valuable consideration, had delivered the note back to the payee, and thereby had parted with all his right and interest in the note, and that the right of action had revived in the payee. A demurrer was sustained to this plea, and, we think, very…
2Cited by14 opinions
- Bowles v. OakmanMichigan Supreme Court · 1929
- Roberts v. SnowNebraska Supreme Court · 1889
- Gamel v. HyndsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
- Kazunas v. WrightAppellate Court of Illinois · 1936
- Feulner v. GillamAppellate Court of Illinois · 1918
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.