Legal Opinion

Nelson v. Mutual of Enumclaw

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided July 7, 2005No. 22874-6-IIIPublished

1Opinion of the Court

115 P.3d 332 (2005)

Dennis NELSON and Deanna Nelson, husband and wife, Respondents,

v.

MUTUAL OF ENUMCLAW, Petitioner.

No. 22874-6-III.

Court of Appeals of Washington, Division Three, Panel Eight.

May 24, 2005.

Publication Ordered July 7, 2005.

Brad E. Smith, Attorney at Law, Spokane, WA, for Appellant.

Patrick R. Acres, Attorney at Law, Moses Lake, WA, for Respondent.

KURTZ, J.

¶ 1 Dennis and Deanna Nelson seek to recover underinsured motorist benefits under their insurance policy with Mutual of Enumclaw for injuries sustained by Ms. Nelson. At the time of the accident, Ms. Nelson was driving a vehicle…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. State Farm General Insurance v. EmersonWashington Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Dairyland Insurance v. WardWashington Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Progressive Casualty Insurance v. JesterWashington Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Grange Insurance v. MacKenzieWashington Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Liberty Mutual Insurance v. TrippWashington Supreme Court · 2001

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API