Grange Insurance v. MacKenzie
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtPearson, J.
The issue presented is whether a "use of other automobiles" clause in an automobile insurance contract is effective to deny coverage where the named insured was the exclusive driver of a car that was not covered under the policy and was owned by a member of that insured's household. We hold that the facts here bring this case squarely within the exception clause. Accordingly, we affirm the Court of Appeals decision that summary judgment should have been granted to the insurer.
At the time this case arose, James MacKenzie had been living with his brother, petitioner George MacKenzie, and…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Dairyland Insurance v. WardWashington Supreme Court · 1974
- Westhaver v. Hawaiian Insurance & Guaranty Co.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1976
- Grange Insurance v. MacKenzieCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1984
- Rocky Mountain Fire & Casualty Co. v. GoetzCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1981
3Cited by38 opinions
- Mid-Century Insurance v. HenaultWashington Supreme Court · 1995
- American Family Insurance Group v. HemenwayNebraska Supreme Court · 1998
- Ross v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1997
- Ross v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1997
- Bartlett v. Amica Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1991
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.