Legal Opinion

Progressive Casualty Insurance v. Jester

Washington Supreme Court

Decided June 21, 1984No. 50007-0PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDimmick, J.

In Mutual of Enumclaw Ins. Co. v. Wiscomb, 97 Wn.2d 203, 213, 643 P.2d 441 (1982), we reserved for another day the question of the validity of motor vehicle insurance policy exclusions consciously bargained for *79by the insurer and its insured. That day has arrived. We hold public policy is not violated by a motorcycle insurance policy provision which excludes liability coverage for claims made by passengers, when the insured intentionally rejected that coverage when offered. We therefore affirm the trial court in holding the exclusion valid.

The facts are undisputed. The late Kelly Jester…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Mutual of Enumclaw Insurance v. WiscombWashington Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Greer v. Northwestern National InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1984
  3. Tucker v. Bankers Life & Casualty Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1965
  4. Whitaker v. Spiegel, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1981
  5. Royse v. BoldtWashington Supreme Court · 1971

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. State Farm General Insurance v. EmersonWashington Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Clements v. Travelers Indemnity Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Greer v. Northwestern National InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Eurick v. Pemco Insurance Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1987
  5. SAFECO INSURANCE CO. OF AM. v. HirschmannWashington Supreme Court · 1989

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API