Solesbee v. Balkcom
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Black
Petitioner was convicted of murder in a Georgia state court. His sentence was death by electrocution. Subsequently he asked the Governor to postpone execution *10on the ground that after conviction and sentence he had become insane. Acting under authority granted by § 27-2602 of the Georgia Code1 the Governor appointed three physicians who examined petitioner and declared him sane. Petitioner then filed this habeas corpus proceeding again alleging his insanity. He contended that the due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment required that his claim of insanity after sentence be originally…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Williams v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Ex Parte United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Burns v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Nobles v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Phyle v. DuffySupreme Court of the United States · 1948
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by153 opinions
- Ake v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Ford v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Glossip v. GrossSupreme Court of the United States · 2015
- John A. Spinkellink, 1 v. Louie L. Wainwright, Secretary, Florida Department of Offender RehabilitationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
- State v. HarrisSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2004
148 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.