Legal Opinion · Dissent

McCracken v. Teets

California Supreme Court

Decided November 6, 1953No. S. F. 18788Published

1Dissent

TRAYNOR, J.,

Dissenting. — Humanitarian considerations have led the Legislature to extend to persons under judgment of death the privilege of avoiding punishment while insane. *654(Pen. Code, § 1367.) The warden of the state prison is charged with the responsibility of determining whether there is good reason to believe that a person under judgment of death has become insane. (Pen. Code, § 3701.) Mandamus cannot properly issue to compel the warden to institute proceedings under section 3701, since the courts are prohibited from suspending the execution of a judgment of death (Pen. Code, § 3700),…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Solesbee v. BalkcomSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
  2. Nobles v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  3. In Re PhyleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  4. Markwort v. McGeeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  5. People v. SloperCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API