State v. Fisher
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtHerbert R. Brown, J.
The central issues in this case are whether the state has an appeal as of right from the order granting shock probation and, if not, whether the decision to deny leave to appeal lies within the discretion of the appellate court.
Preliminarily, we concede validity to the state’s claim that the trial court erred in granting shock probation to the appellee. The authority of the court to grant shock probation pursuant to R.C. 2947.061 is subject to the restrictions contained in R.C. 2951.02 to 2951.09. The criteria for and against probation or suspension of sentence are set forth in R.C. 2951.02.…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- State v. KeetonOhio Supreme Court · 1985
- Freeman v. MaxwellOhio Supreme Court · 1965
- State v. WallaceOhio Supreme Court · 1975
- State v. HughesOhio Supreme Court · 1975
- State v. HuntsmanOhio Supreme Court · 1969
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by48 opinions
- State v. BistrickyOhio Supreme Court · 1990
- Rafael Deitz v. Christine MoneyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004
- State v. NolingOhio Supreme Court · 2013
- State v. SmithOhio Supreme Court · 1989
- State v. MatthewsOhio Supreme Court · 1998
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.