Legal Opinion

State v. Hughes

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided March 19, 1975No. 73-1037PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCoRRigaN, J.

Appellant maintains in a single proposition of law that:

“The provisions of Ohio Revised Code, Section 2945.68, requiring the permission of the Court of Appeals before a bill of exceptions may be filed, are procedural in nature and are inconsistent with, and superseded by, the Rules of Appellate Procedure,, ’ ’

Appellant, in this case, filed a notice of appeal in the trial court pursuant to App. R. 4(B). App. R. 4(B) permits the prosecution to appeal as of right in criminal cases. This rule, as applicable to appeals by the prosecution, is in conflict with R. C. 2945.68.

R. C. 2945.68 permits a…

2Cited by34 opinions

  1. Erwin v. BryanOhio Supreme Court · 2010
  2. State v. FisherOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Boyer v. BoyerOhio Supreme Court · 1976
  4. State v. Craig (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2020
  5. State ex rel. Leis v. KraftOhio Supreme Court · 1984

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API