Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Gray v. Fox

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 31, 1984No. Civ. 68719PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

KLEIN, P. J.

Defendant and appellant Real Estate Commissioner of the State of California (Commissioner) appeals from an order directing payment to plaintiffs and respondents Dallas H. Gray III and Susan L. Gray (the Grays) of money from the Real Estate Fund for purposes of education, research and recovery (Fund).

Since the Grays sustained their burden of proving they were defrauded by Stephen Hobbs (Hobbs), a licensed real estate broker, acting in the course of a licensed real estate transaction, the judgment is affirmed.

Procedural and Factual Background

On February 6, 1980, the Grays…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Crawford v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Ward v. TaggartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Davis v. ChipmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
  4. Fuller v. LindenbaumCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
  5. Firpo v. MurphyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Williams v. WraxallCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
  2. Montoya v. McLeodCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
  3. Murphy v. Today's Properties, Ltd.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  4. Stout v. EdmondsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
  5. In Re Charles Armstrong, Debtor, Charles Armstrong, Helen Armstrong v. Department of Real Estate, State of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API