Legal Opinion

In Re Charles Armstrong, Debtor, Charles Armstrong, Helen Armstrong v. Department of Real Estate, State of California

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided February 18, 1988No. 87-5613PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ALARCON, Circuit Judge:

I

Defendant-Appellant Department of Real Estate, State of California (Department) appeals from the district court’s order granting plaintiff-appellee Charles Armstrong (Armstrong) $20,000 from California’s “Real Estate Recovery Fund” (the Fund). This is an adversarial proceeding in bankruptcy in which the substantive law of California applies. We reverse.

II

Armstrong brought this action for fraud in the district court against Flynn Realty, Inc. (“Flynn”), a debtor in Chapter 11, and several individuals (some of whom were Flynn employees) contending they made…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Turner v. McMahonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
  2. In Re Robert Lee Thomas, Debtor. Robert & Karen Lucas v. Robert Lee Thomas, California Real Estate Recovery Fund, Real Party in InterestCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
  3. Froid v. FoxCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982
  4. Deas v. KnappCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981
  5. Lorenz v. SauerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Valley Bank of Nevada, a Nevada Banking Corporation v. Plus System, Inc., a Delaware Membership CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
  2. Chaffin v. Commissioner of Arizona Department of Real EstateCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API